The five most stupid people in the world and their "pet" politician:
Barack Bush - The Supreme Dealer of Death
The 2009 awarding of the Nobel Peace prize to Barack Bush is just more sad proof that we are doomed.
The 2009 awarding of the Nobel Peace prize to Barack Bush is just more sad proof that we are doomed.
Doomed because humans are nothing but purely emotional beings which are totally ruled by cognitive biases and motivated reasoning.
Or simply put - illogical emotions.
This November there is a vote in the United States.
Voting however is a purely emotional action - people vote for who they like which is based on emotion - nothing else.
Every four years people will argue and debate and make memes and articles and stories and advertisements all based on various forms of logos, ethos or pathos.
AS IF it made a difference!
The choice was made in the voters' minds long before the election - all of the debates and TV shows and advertisements are totally superfluous!
The Europeans are also a special case.
I have lived in Germany now since 1995.
One of the most profound realizations I have had is that the Europeans and especially the Germans are not one single bit smarter, more enlightened, or more mature or educated than the Americans. Lo, The Nobel committee and the "international community" have once and for all delivered the definitive proof that they are even more emotional and succumb to cognitive biases even more than the Americans.
Logic?
Truth?
Reason?
All ridiculous jokes in Europe!
Almost all Europeans automatically love Obama - and they don't even know why!
I recently asked a 24 year old work colleague of mine who she would vote for if she could in the USA.
She said "Obama, because he's closer to the people".
Interesting, and indeed I was impressed that she gave me a reason that she believed in and not a knee jerk rationalization like most Americans would.
But nevertheless proof of the sickening European mindset.
How does a 24 year old European even have an opinion about a politician they have no idea about?
Indeed my colleague admitted she knows nothing about politics.
This is our dilemma in a nutshell - people all over the world are allowed to vote - but in absence of all facts or knowledge we are mercilessly delivered to our cognitive biases i.e. pure emotion.
And where do these emotions come from?
Well they can only come from one place if you don't have any other sources - the mainstream media!
WE ARE DOOMED!
In seeking the truth, one becomes a polemic or as I like to say a "polarizer".
I have to laugh when I see such titles as "conservative" given to certain European politicians (see Kaci Kullmann Five above).
After having lived on two continents I can soundly and resolvedly tell you there is no such thing as a "conservative" politician in Europe.
In Europe there is only LEFT and FARTHER LEFT!
Thorbjörn Jagland,
Lead destroyer of truth on all levels.Indeed, the Nobel committee was completely successful in making the Nobel Peace Prize totally devoid of all value... even its symbolic value!
It has become a black mark for its receivers, a curse, a prime indicator of irony, hypocrisy and criminal distortion of the truth.
Any decent normal person nowadays would shirk at the thought of receiving the same prize awarded to the likes of Kissinger, Obama, or even the EU!
Witness his and the committee's declaration of stupidity and absolute denial of the truth:
The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama's initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population.For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world's leading spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama's appeal that "Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges."Oslo, October 9, 2009
Question:
Do you think the Nobel Committe members have any shame?
Are they embarassed by their decision three years later and by what their candidate has done?
Do they regret any of their decisions?
A polemic (
/pəˈlɛmɪk/) is a contentious argument that is intended to establish the truth of a specific belief and the falsity of the contrary belief. Polemics are mostly seen in arguments about very controversial topics.The art or practice of such argumentation is called polemics.
Do you think the Nobel Committe members have any shame?
Are they embarassed by their decision three years later and by what their candidate has done?
Do they regret any of their decisions?
A polemic (
/pəˈlɛmɪk/) is a contentious argument that is intended to establish the truth of a specific belief and the falsity of the contrary belief. Polemics are mostly seen in arguments about very controversial topics.The art or practice of such argumentation is called polemics.
The following is a great polemic from a truth seeker at sedition.com:
Dear Norway, have your fucking DNA back
Saturday, 9 October 2010
I'm one quarter Norwegian. I'm sorry. I renounce it and it wasn't just the whales.
Alfred Nobel wrote the Peace Prize should go to the one who–
Alfred Nobel wrote the Peace Prize should go to the one who–
…shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.
A year ago today a man engaged in running two wars, uncounted secret prisons where persons are tortured to death, and giving orders that result in the incidental murder of thousands of civilians annually was given the Nobel Peace Pizzle by the five square-heads so drunk off their asses on Eksport and Aass Bock, so utterly high on the smell of their own progressiveness, so white they are in danger of getting lost in the lightest snowfall, so over-laden with the burden of raising Negroes to international power, and so dizzy in love with irony that they gave a Peace Prize to the manager of the biggest kill machine in history they had to be called the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
And for posterity because it was hard to find anywhere else–
A year ago today a man engaged in running two wars, uncounted secret prisons where persons are tortured to death, and giving orders that result in the incidental murder of thousands of civilians annually was given the Nobel Peace Pizzle by the five square-heads so drunk off their asses on Eksport and Aass Bock, so utterly high on the smell of their own progressiveness, so white they are in danger of getting lost in the lightest snowfall, so over-laden with the burden of raising Negroes to international power, and so dizzy in love with irony that they gave a Peace Prize to the manager of the biggest kill machine in history they had to be called the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
And for posterity because it was hard to find anywhere else–
Thorbjørn Jagland, leader
Kaci Kullmann Five (no relation, well… not anymore!)
Sissel Rønbeck
Ågot Valle
Inger-Marie Ytterhorn
Che scemo, in the words of my adoptive homeland. Italy is a country, at least, having no embarrassment in its leadership or history!
Afterword:
I do not agree with or condone his use of the word "negroe", however in Europe it is still acceptable - especially among the older generations. Political correctness has not replaced it quite yet with "African American" etc.
He could have just as easily used the word "idiot" because race is irrelevant here.
Or is it?
Obama would not have any symbolic significance if he wasn't half black would he?
Do you think he would have got elected if he was all white instead?
