This blog is about the biggest bastards in US political history. If George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin & Co. were alive today; they would definitely shoot these bastards!
But I guess ol' Jonathan was kind of in a corner, what do rats do when they're cornered?
"This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure [the Congressional Budget Office] did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. OK? …"
"Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever … that was really, really critical to get the thing to pass. Look, I wish … we could make it all transparent, but I'd rather have this law than not. "
"[I]f you had a law which explicitly said that healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed."
You gotta hand it to him for finally fessing up and coming clean with the truth about Obamacare.
But YES, he is one of the biggest bastards because he was the chief architect of Obamacare, and he helped get it through, with the "Ends Justifies the Means" mentality.
This has got to be the most disgusting thing I have ever seen.
Pay special attention to what this guy says about "due process".
Do you think if George Washington or Thomas Jefferson were alive today they would put up with this?
Since we are already perpetually re-defining our laws and disregarding the constitution, isn't it just a matter of time before these guys have to arrest themselves for treason/terrorism/sedition or soon to come "evil thinking"?
I wanted to give this guy a fair chance.
I really did - given the circumstances with which he took over the presidency, a world of shit and the entire "international community" resting on his shoulders; he could just not win this in any way.
Even hating the democrats as much as I do, I try to give everyone a fair trial. Reagan, the republican god was also a democrat at first - then he moved over to the republicans (do not infer that I support republicans - they are bastards too).
But despite all my rationalizations and accusations - this banker owned demagogue is no longer defendable.
No, he is downright despicable and let me tell you why:
It wasn't enough to continue all of Bush's anti-constitutional policies.
Being a professor of constitutional law - seems like he only uses this knowledge to skirt the constitutional responsibilities he took as an oath upon becoming president.
It wasn't enough, that he got nominated for a Nobel peace prize after only 2 weeks of being in office.
But he had to go and accept it too.
Any normal man who just sent 20+ thousand troops to Afghanistan would have declined this award on basis of integrity.
Then he gave a speech in which some stupid Norwegian Princess cried upon hearing.
This speech , as far as I'm concerned, will go down in history not only as the most shining example of hypocrisy made paramount- but also the most perfect example of newspeak the world has ever known. Orwell would have had a spontaneous orgasm upon hearing it.
Nowadays it seems a Nobel peace prize is just a license to kill. Or so Obama would have you believe since he has killed more people with remote controlled drones than any other person on earth.
Armed with these new "marching orders" and his symbolic scepter of untouchability he now marches into any and every land he wants with or without a UN mandate or Congressional permission/declaration of war. Libya? Remember when Bush marched into Iraq without a UN mandate and the entire world broke out in spontaneous demonstrations of Guiness book proportions?
But it's OK, Obama's a democrat so "that's different"......
All this wasn't enough for him, so on the very last day of 2011, when everyone was sleeping (which is quite often in the senate) he signed the NDAA into law.
It defies belief, it hurts the jawbone to be so violently slammed to the floor, that the first 1/2 black president of the United States could sign such a blatant GESTAPO bill into law.
As an African-American, Civil rights and injustice should be this guy's middle name.
He should be hypersensitive to all violations of the kind.
Instead he has proven that he is a BANKER OWNED puppet.
This is the proverbial "salt in the wounds".
First the gay community was let down, then the black/African-American community, then every citizen of the United States now gets to experience the neo-gestapo.
He will forever be remembered as the president who signed the Gestapo bill into law.
"That black guy who enabled the neo-gestapo in AMERICA! Can you believe that!?"
Is this really happening in America?
Can an African-American professor of constitutional law really do this?
Is this the dream Martin Luther King had of a better America?
The Neo-Communist Nobility
How can ANYONE possibly support this ultimate personification of EVIL?
Mr.President - George Washington would spit in your face right now, and your bankster masters have made a fool of you.
The next election - this November - I am going to write in "Adolf Hitler" for president.
At least he never lied.
This guy is just the biggest hypocrite to ever hit the political scene. He is truly beyond compare. A perfect example of the "untouchable" Lib-dem; 2x2=5.
Awesome! This is the most amazing and perfectly eloquent argument I have seen against the Carbon Czar bastard(s)! Please spread this around as much as possible! It's applicable to EVERYONE, not just Australians.
There is only one thing more disgusting than Al Goreshit, and that's Julia Gillard. This disgusting lying red-headed system of death is forcing her will on Australia with bullshit science. Oh yes- science IS a belief system, and the politicians are choosing to believe the groups of scientists which are going to make them the most money.
The carbon tax is the most blatant proof that the politicians are in the pockets of the big bankers. Julia Gillard is a redheaded devil. Taking the lead from Clinton, politicians lie straight to your face now and say "f***you! what are you gonna do about it?!"
I hope the world wakes up to these lying bastards and run them out of office as soon as possible.
Basically what they are saying is "you can be as dirty as you want as long as you pay us". At least at British Airways the carbon offset is still voluntary when you purchase a ticket - for now.
They offer an interesting FAQ for what happens to your money when it goes to a carbon offset.
Basically the money you pay (if still not being forced/taxed out of it) will go into a "carbon portfolio".
These portfolios are managed by........yup- big bankers like Lehmann and other bastards that couldn't give a shit about the environment. But that's not the point, the point is that these portfolios contain various programs which are supposed to "offset carbon". So if you're lucky, a sliver of that money will go to planting a tree somewhere, thousands of miles away from where you are now "producing" carbon. Can you believe this?!!? That's how you "offset" carbon, plant a tree somewhere, and simultaneously spew carbon in the atmosphere.
So in the end, the whole carbon scam is nothing but a nice new HUGE set of poker chips that the politicians and big bankers get to play with and make money for themselves all behind the impenetrable shield of "Environment" and fueled by our fears of the unknown. How petty and base.
Nothing but a mafia protection money racket - and we're being forced to pay it!
And just who will define who is a big polluter or not?
Emission Trading Scheme (Scam)
Just how exactly do you trade "emissions"? Really now, do they think we are that stupid?
Just another perfect example of Newspeak today! 2+2=5!
No Cap
The true mass and dimensions of this are being held secret or undefined on purpose of course. The amount of chips in the carbon casino must always be VARIABLE - so that only the big bankers and politician will understand what's really going on. While they offer us more intangible concepts and ideals of prosperity,safety, security etc. they're playing poker in the backrooms with our money!
I wonder if this is what Nixon had in mind in 1971 when he took the dollar off of the gold standard. Keep it VARIABLE so your banker buddies can do what they want!
Incomprehensible Derivatives
As usual, we are being promised intangible concepts for our hard earned money.
Reminiscent of the way the politicians pushed for the EU- a strong Economy and all sorts of lofty goals were passed on as real facts. In the meantime buying power was totally destroyed - overnight!
Global Banking Cartel
Merril Lynch
Goldmann Sachs
JP Morgan
The World Bank
Morgan Stanley
Citigroup
Tax Bracket Creep
This is what really happens once the politicians get what they want and their policies kick in. It's irreversable of course, that is, until the next crash...
The costs paid by "big polluters" will be passed through to the prices of the goods you buy(!)
Quote from the video - she actually says this with a straight face - as her selling point!!!
And this is supposed to be a good thing?
Wealth Transfer to International Bankers
It's very simple, just watch the money. Watch it go from your wallet - directly into theirs.
Blood and Gore
Al Goreshits company with his cohort David Blood. NOT a joke!
The UN - Big Brother's legal arm and his newest weapon - Agenda 21!
International Speculators - ratchet it up or down at will to punish nations, companies, individuals
The carbon tax is subject to the same mysterious nebulous forces which the stock market is and which only the big bankers propose to have sufficient knowledge about.
At this point I must apologize to any of my readers that may be in the Mafia - these politicians make the Mafia look like the most honest and ethical high integrity businessmen ever!
Embedded in every facet of our life
It's a one way street folks. Once a tax like this gets passed - it's over!
But let's put the scientific, or better said the non-scientific arguments aside and assume the global warming paranoia is true.
The "solutions" being offered are NOT solutions at all!
There will not be one single MEASURABLE impact on the environment (nevermind co2 ppm etc. in the air)!
So once again a permanent tax is being passed which will simply just rob people.
There are no checks or quality gates are there?
There are no milestones?
There are no MEASURABLE criteria that have to be passed are there?
There is no emergency brake is there?
If in 5 years there is no measurable impact on the environment - are there measures to AUTOMATICALLY repeal the tax?
The answers are obvious.
I am not even in Australia, what I hate is what's happening here.
The carbon tax is wrong on all levels.
No matter where you go in the world- what's happening is a new penalty tax is being established solely on bad psychology.
"Oh, look! We have a problem, let's make a new tax!"
That simply doesn't do anything.
The people who are making a difference, already are... without any new taxes.
Look at all the manufacturers from Airbus, Boeing, Ford, etc. that are making cleaner more efficient vehicles WITHOUT raising taxes.
The modus-operandi of the politicians is all wrong.
They simply see a new angle to get a new tax in and make themselves more money.
I would like to see these politicians held accountable for their actions.
If they cannot prove that their carbon scam has actually made a REAL difference in the next 10 years, then they should have to pay the taxpayers back every penny WITH compounded interest.
After all, the tax is going into portfolios managed by the most capable people in the world right?
At least that's what they're saying and that's how they're selling it to us.
So if in about 10 years there is no meaningful impact - it should be no problem to pay the money back right?
We should be able to laugh about that last question, problem is- they're doing it with our money- our livelihood.
Not a laughing matter.
“People can choose not to believe in man-made climate change—but the correct term here is ‚‘belief—believing is an act of faith” says Kaufmann, “whereas science is a testing of hypotheses and seeing whether they hold up against real world data.” For Kaufmann, it seems merely adding one new theory to—as Black delineates them in his article—others is providing a scientific “answer”. Alternative hypotheses should, it seems, in Kaufmann-Black world, be viewed as anti-science “unbelief”. Perverse, no? According to my math—and it’s not bad—one theory plus alternative theories add up to a bundle of mere theories, not to conclusive empirical science. Why then take some much time to demonize alternative theories, views and opinion? Unless, of course, the only actual empirical evidence that point to a particularly glaring alternative hypothesis: that the absence of temperature rise suggests the CO2 causative link is looking increasingly ‚‘unscientific’. Don’t be afraid of what you see.
